GeForce 810M vs Quadro FX 4600

NVIDIA

GeForce 810M

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4600

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 810M vs Quadro FX 4600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 810M vs Quadro FX 4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 810M vs Quadro FX 4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 810M

2014

Why buy it

  • 6.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 768 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

Quadro FX 4600

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (768 MB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 810M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 810M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.2% in PassMark G3D (420 vs 403), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 810M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 4600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 4600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 810M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 810M vs Quadro FX 4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 810M

The GeForce 810M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 420 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4600

The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 810M scores 420 and the Quadro FX 4600 reaches 403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 810M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 4600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 810M) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4600). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 810M) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4600).

FeatureGeForce 810MQuadro FX 4600
G3D Mark Score
420+4%
403
Architecture
Maxwell
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS+87%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
24+200%
TMUs
16
64+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB+426%
0.19 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 810M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 4600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 810MQuadro FX 4600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 810M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4600 carries 768 MB. Quadro FX 4600 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 810M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 810M) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4600) — the GeForce 810M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 810MQuadro FX 4600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.75 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+426%
0.19 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 810M draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 4600's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 810M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 810M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 810MQuadro FX 4600
TDP
33W-78%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
12.7+370%
2.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 810M (2014 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 810MQuadro FX 4600
MSRP
$1999
Codename
GM108
GT200B
Release
March 12 2014
November 11 2008
Ranking
#854
#884

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.