
GeForce 810M

Quadro FX 4600
GeForce 810M vs Quadro FX 4600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 810M vs Quadro FX 4600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 810M vs Quadro FX 4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 810M
2014Why buy it
- ✅6.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 768 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Quadro FX 4600
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (768 MB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 810M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 810M vs Quadro FX 4600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 810M
The GeForce 810M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 420 points.

Quadro FX 4600
The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 810M scores 420 and the Quadro FX 4600 reaches 403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 810M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 4600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 810M) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4600). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 810M) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4600).
| Feature | GeForce 810M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 420+4% | 403 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS+87% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 16 | 64+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+426% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 810M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 4600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 810M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 810M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4600 carries 768 MB. Quadro FX 4600 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 810M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 810M) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4600) — the GeForce 810M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 810M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.75 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+426% | 0.19 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 810M draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 4600's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 810M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 810M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 810M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.7+370% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 810M (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 810M | Quadro FX 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1999 |
| Codename | GM108 | GT200B |
| Release | March 12 2014 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #854 | #884 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














