Radeon HD 2400
VS
GeForce 405

Radeon HD 2400 vs GeForce 405

AMD

Radeon HD 2400

2009Core: 850 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 405

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 2400 is positioned at rank 323 and the GeForce 405 is on rank 589, so the Radeon HD 2400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2400

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
4741%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4555%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
4502%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4494%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4485%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
4459%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
4403%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4387%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4346%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
4335%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
4282%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4273%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
4196%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4193%
#308
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
5229%
#323
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
100%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
99%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
91%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
86%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
76%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
73%
#334
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
56%
#336
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
56%
#337
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
54%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 405

#579
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3680%
#581
3336%
#582
3327%
#586
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3026%
#587
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3005%
#589
GeForce 405
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
100%
#590
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
100%
#591
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
100%
#592
GeForce 510
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
99%
#593
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
97%
#594
GeForce 9300M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
96%
#596
GeForce 9800 GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $20
95%
#598
GeForce 9100M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
94%
#599
Mobility Radeon X1900
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
94%
#600
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#601
GeForce 210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
94%
#602
Radeon R7 M365X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
#603
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
93%
#604
Radeon R7 M260DX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 405 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The GeForce 405 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 2400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 2400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 405.

InsightRadeon HD 2400GeForce 405
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 405 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 405 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $10), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 95% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 2400GeForce 405
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+95%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2400 and GeForce 405

AMD

Radeon HD 2400

The Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $249.

NVIDIA

GeForce 405

The GeForce 405 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 2400 scores 121 and the GeForce 405 reaches 118 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2400 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce 405 uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 2400) vs 640 (GeForce 405). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 405).

FeatureRadeon HD 2400GeForce 405
G3D Mark Score
121+3%
118
Architecture
TeraScale
Maxwell
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+25%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.36 TFLOPS+4%
1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
160 KB
320 KB+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 2400GeForce 405
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2400) vs 2 MB (GeForce 405) — the GeForce 405 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400GeForce 405
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2400 draws 190W versus the GeForce 405's 75W — a 86.8% difference. The GeForce 405 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2400) vs 350W (GeForce 405). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon HD 2400GeForce 405
TDP
190W
75W-61%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Legacy
Length
168mm
Height
64mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.6
1.6+167%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 2400 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 405 launched at $40 and now averages $5. The GeForce 405 costs 50% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.1 (Radeon HD 2400) vs 23.6 (GeForce 405) — the GeForce 405 offers 95% better value. The GeForce 405 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 2400GeForce 405
MSRP
$79
$40-49%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$5-50%
Performance per Dollar
12.1
23.6+95%
Codename
RV790
GM107
Release
April 2 2009
October 27 2015
Ranking
#762
#671