Radeon HD 2400 vs GeForce Go 7800
Radeon HD 2400
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 2400 is positioned at rank 323 and the GeForce Go 7800 is on rank 265, so the GeForce Go 7800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 2400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7800.
| Insight | Radeon HD 2400 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 2400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2400 and GeForce Go 7800
Radeon HD 2400
The Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce Go 7800
The GeForce Go 7800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2400 scores 121 versus the GeForce Go 7800's 115 — the Radeon HD 2400 leads by 5.2%. The Radeon HD 2400 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce Go 7800 uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 2400) vs 2,304 (GeForce Go 7800). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400) vs 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2400 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 121+5% | 115 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2304+188% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS | 4.156 TFLOPS+206% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 192+380% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.5 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 2400 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 2400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7800 has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 2400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2400) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800) — the GeForce Go 7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2400 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.5 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 2400 draws 190W versus the GeForce Go 7800's 250W — a 27.3% difference. The Radeon HD 2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2400) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7800). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2400 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-24% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6+20% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7800 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2400 | GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | — |
| Codename | RV790 | GK110 |
| Release | April 2 2009 | May 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #762 | #320 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 2400 and GeForce Go 7800
