Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Radeon HD 6370M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Radeon HD 6370M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Radeon HD 6370M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 2600 XT

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6370M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6370M

2011

Why buy it

✅32.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6370M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 2600 XT instead at 283 vs 276, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 2600 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 2600 XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6370M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Radeon HD 6370M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 2600 XT

The Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 283 points.

Radeon HD 6370M

The Radeon HD 6370M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 276 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 2600 XT scores 283 and the Radeon HD 6370M reaches 276 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 6370M uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6370M). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6370M).

Feature	Radeon HD 2600 XT	Radeon HD 6370M
G3D Mark Score	283+3%	276
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	480	960+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.696 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+88%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	48+100%
L1 Cache	48 KB	192 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 2600 XT	Radeon HD 6370M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 2600 XT has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6370M carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 6370M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2600 XT and System on the Radeon HD 6370M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6370M) — the Radeon HD 6370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 2600 XT	Radeon HD 6370M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2600 XT draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 6370M's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6370M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon HD 2600 XT	Radeon HD 6370M
TDP	25W-67%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	11.3+205%	3.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 2600 XT (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 2600 XT	Radeon HD 6370M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	Thames	Blackcomb
Release	January 7 2013	January 4 2011
Ranking	#883	#654

Search Radeon HD 2600 XT on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6370M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.