
GeForce 510

Radeon HD 2600 XT
GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 510
2022Why buy it
- β 60.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- β Delivers 106% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Radeon HD 2600 XT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 510 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- βOlder hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon HD 2600 XT
2013Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than GeForce 510 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β101% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 510
The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

Radeon HD 2600 XT
The Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 283 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 510 scores 290 and the Radeon HD 2600 XT reaches 283 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 2600 XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2600 XT).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 290+2% | 283 |
| Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+327% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+580% | 0.696 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+400% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+3900% | 0.05 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 510 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 2600 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2600 XT carries 512 MB. GeForce 510 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 510 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2600 XT. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2600 XT) β the GeForce 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 2600 XT's 25W β a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | β |
| Height | 64mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 11.6+3% | 11.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 510 came in at $99, while the Radeon HD 2600 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce 510 was 50.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce 510) vs 1.4 (Radeon HD 2600 XT) β the GeForce 510 offers 107.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 510 (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-50% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9+107% | 1.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | Thames |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #407 | #883 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















