GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT

NVIDIA

GeForce 510

2022Core: 832 MHzBoost: 1155 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 2600 XT

2013Core: 725 MHz

GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 510

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…60.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…Costs $100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 106% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • βœ…300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • βœ…Radeon HD 2600 XT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 510 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon HD 2600 XT

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 510 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    101% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 510 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 60.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (290 vs 283), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 510 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 510 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 106% (2.9 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 510

The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 2600 XT

The Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 283 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 510 scores 290 and the Radeon HD 2600 XT reaches 283 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 2600 XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2600 XT).

FeatureGeForce 510Radeon HD 2600 XT
G3D Mark Score
290+2%
283
Architecture
Ampere
TeraScale 2
Process Node
8 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048+327%
480
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.731 TFLOPS+580%
0.696 TFLOPS
ROPs
40+400%
8
TMUs
64+167%
24
L1 Cache
2 MB+3900%
0.05 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 510 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 2600 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 510Radeon HD 2600 XT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2600 XT carries 512 MB. GeForce 510 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 510 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2600 XT. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2600 XT) β€” the GeForce 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 510Radeon HD 2600 XT
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 2600 XT's 25W β€” a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 510Radeon HD 2600 XT
TDP
25W
25W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
β€”
Height
64mm
β€”
Slots
1
β€”
Temp (Load)
70Β°C
β€”
Perf/Watt
11.6+3%
11.3
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 510 came in at $99, while the Radeon HD 2600 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce 510 was 50.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce 510) vs 1.4 (Radeon HD 2600 XT) β€” the GeForce 510 offers 107.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 510 (2022 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 510Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP
$99-50%
$199
Performance per Dollar
2.9+107%
1.4
Codename
GA107
Thames
Release
Maio 2022
January 7 2013
Ranking
#407
#883

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.