Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Radeon HD 8330

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Radeon HD 8330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Radeon HD 8330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 2600 XT

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 175W, a 150W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8330 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
298% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8330

2010

Why buy it

✅31.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 286.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌600% higher power demand at 175W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8330 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 31.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 2600 XT instead at 283 vs 275, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 2600 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8330 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 286.7% (5.5 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8330 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 2600 XT has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Radeon HD 8330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 2600 XT

The Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 283 points.

Radeon HD 8330

The Radeon HD 8330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 2600 XT scores 283 and the Radeon HD 8330 reaches 275 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 8330 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 8330). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8330).

Feature	Radeon HD 2600 XT	Radeon HD 8330
G3D Mark Score	283+3%	275
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	480	1120+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.696 TFLOPS	1.792 TFLOPS+157%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	48 KB	112 KB+133%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 2600 XT	Radeon HD 8330
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2600 XT and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8330. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8330) — the Radeon HD 8330 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 2600 XT	Radeon HD 8330
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2600 XT draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 8330's 175W — a 150% difference. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8330). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon HD 2600 XT	Radeon HD 8330
TDP	25W-86%	175W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	11.3+606%	1.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 2600 XT came in at $199, while the Radeon HD 8330 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8330 was 74.9% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 5.5 (Radeon HD 8330) — the Radeon HD 8330 offers 292.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2600 XT (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	Radeon HD 2600 XT	Radeon HD 8330
MSRP	$199	$50-75%
Performance per Dollar	1.4	5.5+293%
Codename	Thames	Cypress
Release	January 7 2013	February 25 2010
Ranking	#883	#724

Search Radeon HD 2600 XT on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.