Radeon HD 2900 GT
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 600

Radeon HD 2900 GT vs Intel UHD Graphics 600

AMD

Radeon HD 2900 GT

2013Core: 725 MHz
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 600

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 2900 GT is positioned at rank #661 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2900 GT

#651
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
6312%
#653
5722%
#654
5707%
#658
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
5190%
#659
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
5154%
#661
Radeon HD 2900 GT
MSRP: $170|Avg: $15
100%
#662
Radeon HD 8280E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $110
99%
#663
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
98%
#664
Radeon R5 M420
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#665
Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#666
Radeon HD 2900 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
96%
#667
Mobility Radeon 4100
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
96%
#668
GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
95%
#669
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#670
Mobility Radeon X2500
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
95%
#671
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
88%
#672
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
88%
#673
87%
#674
GeForce 505
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
84%
#675
GeForce 9200M GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
84%
#676
Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 2900 GT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 2900 GTIntel UHD Graphics 600
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-6.8%)
Leading raw performance (+6.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2900 GT and Intel UHD Graphics 600

AMD

Radeon HD 2900 GT

The Radeon HD 2900 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 600

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2900 GT scores 292 versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 312 — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 leads by 6.8%. The Radeon HD 2900 GT is built on TeraScale 2 while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 uses Generation 8.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600).

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 GTIntel UHD Graphics 600
G3D Mark Score
292
312+7%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Generation 8.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
480+150%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.696 TFLOPS+73%
0.4032 TFLOPS
ROPs
8+167%
3
TMUs
24
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 GTIntel UHD Graphics 600
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 2900 GT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 2900 GT offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 GTIntel UHD Graphics 600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10 (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 GTIntel UHD Graphics 600
DirectX
10
12+20%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Decoder: UVD vs QSV.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 GTIntel UHD Graphics 600
Encoder
UVD
QSV
Decoder
UVD
QSV
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2900 GT draws 25W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 15W — a 50% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 GTIntel UHD Graphics 600
TDP
25W
15W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
241mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
55°C
Perf/Watt
11.7
20.8+78%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 2900 GT launched at $170 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.5 (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 GTIntel UHD Graphics 600
MSRP
$170
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
19.5
Infinity
Codename
Thames
Broadwell GT2
Release
January 7 2013
September 5 2014
Ranking
#883
#703