
Radeon HD 2900 GT

Radeon HD 7520G
Radeon HD 2900 GT vs Radeon HD 7520G Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 2900 GT vs Radeon HD 7520G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 2900 GT vs Radeon HD 7520G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 2900 GT
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7520G across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌183.3% HIGHER MSRP$170 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.
Radeon HD 7520G
2012Why buy it
- ✅45.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 205.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 2900 GT vs Radeon HD 7520G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 2900 GT
The Radeon HD 2900 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.

Radeon HD 7520G
The Radeon HD 7520G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 315 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2900 GT scores 292 versus the Radeon HD 7520G's 315 — the Radeon HD 7520G leads by 7.9%. The Radeon HD 2900 GT is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 7520G uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7520G). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7520G).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 292 | 315+8% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1792+273% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.696 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+312% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 112+367% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 448 KB+833% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2900 GT and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7520G. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7520G) — the Radeon HD 7520G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10 (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7520G). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10 | 11.2+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7520G). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 2900 GT draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 7520G's 200W — a 155.6% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7520G). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-88% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.7+631% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 2900 GT came in at $170, while the Radeon HD 7520G launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7520G was 64.7% cheaper ($110 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (Radeon HD 2900 GT) vs 5.3 (Radeon HD 7520G) — the Radeon HD 7520G offers 211.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2900 GT (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170 | $60-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7 | 5.3+212% |
| Codename | Thames | Tahiti |
| Release | January 7 2013 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #883 | #454 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















