GeForce 9700M GTS vs Radeon HD 2900 GT

NVIDIA

GeForce 9700M GTS

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 2900 GT

2013Core: 725 MHz

GeForce 9700M GTS vs Radeon HD 2900 GT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9700M GTS vs Radeon HD 2900 GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9700M GTS vs Radeon HD 2900 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9700M GTS

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…43.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
  • ❌500% higher power demand at 150W vs 25W.

Radeon HD 2900 GT

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 25W instead of 150W, a 125W reduction.
  • βœ…More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009βˆ’2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9700M GTS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9700M GTS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 6.8% in PassMark G3D (312 vs 292), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9700M GTS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 2900 GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 2900 GT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9700M GTS has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9700M GTS vs Radeon HD 2900 GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9700M GTS

The GeForce 9700M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 2900 GT

The Radeon HD 2900 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9700M GTS scores 312 versus the Radeon HD 2900 GT's 292 β€” the GeForce 9700M GTS leads by 6.8%. The GeForce 9700M GTS is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 2900 GT uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2900 GT).

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSRadeon HD 2900 GT
G3D Mark Score
312+7%
292
Architecture
G9x
TeraScale 2
Process Node
65 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
224
480+114%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9700M GTS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 2900 GT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSRadeon HD 2900 GT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9700M GTS and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2900 GT.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSRadeon HD 2900 GT
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 10 (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSRadeon HD 2900 GT
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+11%
10
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs UVD (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Decoder: VP2 vs UVD.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSRadeon HD 2900 GT
Encoder
None
UVD
Decoder
VP2
UVD
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
β€”
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9700M GTS draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 2900 GT's 25W β€” a 142.9% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSRadeon HD 2900 GT
TDP
150W
25W-83%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
241mm
Height
0mm
β€”
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
90
β€”
Perf/Watt
2.1
11.7+457%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9700M GTS came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 2900 GT launched at $170. On MSRP, GeForce 9700M GTS was 100+% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 1.7 (Radeon HD 2900 GT) β€” the GeForce 9700M GTS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2900 GT (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSRadeon HD 2900 GT
MSRP
$0-100%
$170
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
1.7
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Thames
Release
July 15 2008
January 7 2013
Ranking
#825
#883

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.