GeForce 9700M GTS vs Radeon HD 2900 GT
GeForce 9700M GTS
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 2900 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2900 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9700M GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 2900 GT.
| Insight | GeForce 9700M GTS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 9700M GTS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9700M GTS and Radeon HD 2900 GT
GeForce 9700M GTS
The GeForce 9700M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.
Radeon HD 2900 GT
The Radeon HD 2900 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9700M GTS scores 312 versus the Radeon HD 2900 GT's 292 — the GeForce 9700M GTS leads by 6.8%. The GeForce 9700M GTS is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 2900 GT uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2900 GT).
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GTS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 312+7% | 292 |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 480+114% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GTS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GTS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 10 (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GTS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+11% | 10 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs UVD (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Decoder: VP2 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GTS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD |
| Decoder | VP2 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9700M GTS draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 2900 GT's 25W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GTS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 25W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1 | 11.7+457% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9700M GTS launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon HD 2900 GT launched at $170 and now averages $15. The GeForce 9700M GTS costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 19.5 (Radeon HD 2900 GT) — the GeForce 9700M GTS offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon HD 2900 GT is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GTS | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $170 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 19.5 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Thames |
| Release | July 15 2008 | January 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #825 | #883 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9700M GTS and Radeon HD 2900 GT
