GeForce 9700M GTS vs Mobility Radeon HD 560v

NVIDIA

GeForce 9700M GTS

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 560v

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9700M GTS vs Mobility Radeon HD 560v Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9700M GTS vs Mobility Radeon HD 560v: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9700M GTS

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Mobility Radeon HD 560v

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 560v is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (318 vs 312), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9700M GTS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 560v makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 560v is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9700M GTS has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9700M GTS vs Mobility Radeon HD 560v Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9700M GTS

The GeForce 9700M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 560v

The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 318 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9700M GTS scores 312 and the Mobility Radeon HD 560v reaches 318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9700M GTS is built on G9x while the Mobility Radeon HD 560v uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v).

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSMobility Radeon HD 560v
G3D Mark Score
312
318+2%
Architecture
G9x
TeraScale 2
Process Node
65 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
224
800+257%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9700M GTS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 560v leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSMobility Radeon HD 560v
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9700M GTS has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 560v carries 1 GB. Mobility Radeon HD 560v gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9700M GTS and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 560v.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSMobility Radeon HD 560v
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSMobility Radeon HD 560v
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+10%
10.1
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9700M GTS draws 150W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 560v's 50W — a 100% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 560v). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSMobility Radeon HD 560v
TDP
150W
50W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90
75°C-17%
Perf/Watt
2.1
6.4+205%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9700M GTS came in at $0, while the Mobility Radeon HD 560v launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce 9700M GTS was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 2.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) — the GeForce 9700M GTS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 560v (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSMobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP
$0-100%
$150
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
2.1
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Broadway
Release
July 15 2008
January 7 2010
Ranking
#825
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.