GeForce 9700M GTS vs Radeon R1E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9700M GTS vs Radeon R1E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9700M GTS vs Radeon R1E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9700M GTS

2008

Why buy it

✅11.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Radeon R1E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9700M GTS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 9700M GTS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (312 vs 301), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R1E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 65nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9700M GTS makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 9700M GTS is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R1E has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9700M GTS vs Radeon R1E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9700M GTS

The GeForce 9700M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

Radeon R1E

The Radeon R1E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 301 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9700M GTS scores 312 and the Radeon R1E reaches 301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9700M GTS is built on G9x while the Radeon R1E uses RDNA 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 128 (Radeon R1E).

Feature	GeForce 9700M GTS	Radeon R1E
G3D Mark Score	312+4%	301
Architecture	G9x	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	65 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	224+75%	128

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9700M GTS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R1E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9700M GTS	Radeon R1E
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9700M GTS and 64-bit on the Radeon R1E.

Feature	GeForce 9700M GTS	Radeon R1E
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 12 (Radeon R1E). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.0. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 9700M GTS	Radeon R1E
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12+8%
Vulkan	N/A	1.0
OpenGL	3.3	4.5+36%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R1E). Decoder: VP2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC (Radeon R1E).

Feature	GeForce 9700M GTS	Radeon R1E
Encoder	None	VCE 2.0
Decoder	VP2	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9700M GTS draws 150W versus the Radeon R1E's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon R1E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 350W (Radeon R1E). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 75.

Feature	GeForce 9700M GTS	Radeon R1E
TDP	150W	15W-90%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	90	75-17%
Perf/Watt	2.1	20.1+857%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9700M GTS came in at $0, while the Radeon R1E launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs Infinity (Radeon R1E) — the Radeon R1E offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R1E (2023 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9700M GTS	Radeon R1E
MSRP	$0	$0
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	Infinity
Codename	NB9E-GTX	Dragon Range
Release	July 15 2008	January 3 2023
Ranking	#825	#843

Search GeForce 9700M GTS on Amazon

Search Radeon R1E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.