GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce 9700M GTS

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce 9700M GTS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce 9700M GTS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 240M GT

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9700M GTS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce 9700M GTS

2008

Why buy it

✅12.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 9700M GTS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 240M GT instead at 320 vs 312, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 240M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 65nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 240M GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce 9700M GTS still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce 9700M GTS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 240M GT

The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.

GeForce 9700M GTS

The GeForce 9700M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 240M GT scores 320 and the GeForce 9700M GTS reaches 312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 240M GT is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9700M GTS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 224 (GeForce 9700M GTS).

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	GeForce 9700M GTS
G3D Mark Score	320+3%	312
Architecture	Maxwell	G9x
Process Node	28 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	384+71%	224

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	GeForce 9700M GTS
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT and 64-bit on the GeForce 9700M GTS.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	GeForce 9700M GTS
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9700M GTS). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	GeForce 9700M GTS
DirectX	10.1	11.1 (10_0)+10%
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 240M GT) vs None (GeForce 9700M GTS). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9700M GTS).

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	GeForce 9700M GTS
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	VP2
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the GeForce 9700M GTS's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 350W (GeForce 9700M GTS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 90.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	GeForce 9700M GTS
TDP	33W-78%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C-11%	90
Perf/Watt	9.7+362%	2.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 240M GT came in at $100, while the GeForce 9700M GTS launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce 9700M GTS was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) vs Infinity (GeForce 9700M GTS) — the GeForce 9700M GTS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 240M GT (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	GeForce 9700M GTS
MSRP	$100	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	3.2	Infinity
Codename	GM108	NB9E-GTX
Release	March 13 2015	July 15 2008
Ranking	#847	#825

Search GeForce 240M GT on Amazon

Search GeForce 9700M GTS on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.