Radeon HD 2900 XT vs Radeon RX Vega 3

AMD

Radeon HD 2900 XT

2013Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 3

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1001 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 2900 XT vs Radeon RX Vega 3 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 2900 XT vs Radeon RX Vega 3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 2900 XT vs Radeon RX Vega 3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 2900 XT

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon RX Vega 3 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 2900 XT is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 3 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Radeon RX Vega 3

2019

Why buy it

  • 40.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 3 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 40.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (684 vs 660), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 2900 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 2900 XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon RX Vega 3 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 2900 XT vs Radeon RX Vega 3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 2900 XT

The Radeon HD 2900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 660 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 3

The Radeon RX Vega 3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1001 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 684 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 2900 XT scores 660 and the Radeon RX Vega 3 reaches 684 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon RX Vega 3 uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 192 (Radeon RX Vega 3). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 0.3844 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 3).

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTRadeon RX Vega 3
G3D Mark Score
660
684+4%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 5.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
480+150%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.696 TFLOPS+81%
0.3844 TFLOPS
ROPs
8+100%
4
TMUs
24+100%
12
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTRadeon RX Vega 3
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 2900 XT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 3 carries 0 MB. Radeon HD 2900 XT gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2900 XT and System on the Radeon RX Vega 3.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTRadeon RX Vega 3
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 3). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTRadeon RX Vega 3
DirectX
10.0
12 (12_1)+20%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD+ (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 3). Decoder: UVD+ vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 3).

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTRadeon RX Vega 3
Encoder
UVD+
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD+
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 2900 XT draws 25W versus the Radeon RX Vega 3's 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 3). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTRadeon RX Vega 3
TDP
25W
15W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
26.4
45.6+73%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 2900 XT came in at $399, while the Radeon RX Vega 3 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 3 was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 3) — the Radeon RX Vega 3 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 3 (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 2900 XTRadeon RX Vega 3
MSRP
$399
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1.7
Infinity
Codename
Thames
Picasso
Release
January 7 2013
January 6 2019
Ranking
#883
#845

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.