
Radeon HD 2900 XT vs Radeon RX Vega 3

Radeon HD 2900 XT
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is positioned at rank #666 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2900 XT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 3 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Radeon RX Vega 3 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 2900 XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 3 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 2900 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 2900 XT | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega 3 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 2900 XT and Radeon RX Vega 3

Radeon HD 2900 XT
The Radeon HD 2900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 660 points.

Radeon RX Vega 3
The Radeon RX Vega 3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1001 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 684 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 2900 XT scores 660 and the Radeon RX Vega 3 reaches 684 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon RX Vega 3 uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 192 (Radeon RX Vega 3). Raw compute: 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 0.3844 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 3).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 660 | 684+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+150% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.696 TFLOPS+81% | 0.3844 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8+100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 24+100% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 2900 XT comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 3 has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 2900 XT offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 3). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12 (12_1)+20% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD+ (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 3). Decoder: UVD+ vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 3).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD+ | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD+ | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 2900 XT draws 25W versus the Radeon RX Vega 3's 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 3). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 15W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4 | 45.6+73% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 2900 XT launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon RX Vega 3 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega 3 costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 3) — the Radeon RX Vega 3 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 3 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2900 XT | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Thames | Picasso |
| Release | January 7 2013 | January 6 2019 |
| Ranking | #883 | #845 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















