
FirePro M7740 vs Radeon HD 2900 XT

FirePro M7740
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 2900 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M7740 is positioned at rank 329 and the Radeon HD 2900 XT is on rank 666, so the FirePro M7740 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M7740
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2900 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M7740 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 2900 XT.
| Insight | FirePro M7740 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 2900 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 2900 XT holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $500), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2381.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M7740 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2381.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M7740 and Radeon HD 2900 XT

FirePro M7740
The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.

Radeon HD 2900 XT
The Radeon HD 2900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 660 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M7740 scores 665 and the Radeon HD 2900 XT reaches 660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M7740 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 2900 XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M7740) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 XT).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 665 | 660 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+7% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.696 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+167% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro M7740) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro M7740) vs UVD+ (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD+. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M7740) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 2900 XT).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD+ |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | UVD+ |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M7740 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 2900 XT's 25W — a 27.6% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M7740) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 25W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.2 | 26.4+31% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M7740 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon HD 2900 XT launched at $399 and now averages $20. The Radeon HD 2900 XT costs 96% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.3 (FirePro M7740) vs 33.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT) — the Radeon HD 2900 XT offers 2438.5% better value. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $399-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $20-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3 | 33.0+2438% |
| Codename | Chelsea | Thames |
| Release | June 27 2012 | January 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #752 | #883 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















