
FirePro M7740

NVS 510
FirePro M7740 vs NVS 510 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M7740 vs NVS 510 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M7740 vs NVS 510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M7740
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 68W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌11.4% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
NVS 510
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌106.1% higher power demand at 68W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M7740 vs NVS 510 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M7740
The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.

NVS 510
The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M7740 scores 665 and the NVS 510 reaches 680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M7740 is built on GCN 1.0 while the NVS 510 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M7740) vs 512 (NVS 510). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 665 | 680+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+53% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M7740 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 510 carries 2 GB. NVS 510 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M7740 and 64-bit on the NVS 510. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M7740) vs 1 MB (NVS 510) — the NVS 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro M7740) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 510). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 (11_0)+19% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro M7740) vs 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510). Decoder: UVD 2 vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M7740) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M7740 draws 33W versus the NVS 510's 68W — a 69.3% difference. The FirePro M7740 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M7740) vs 350W (NVS 510). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-51% | 68W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 160mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 20.2+102% | 10.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M7740 came in at $500, while the NVS 510 launched at $449. On MSRP, NVS 510 was 10.2% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (FirePro M7740) vs 1.5 (NVS 510) — the NVS 510 offers 15.4% better value. The newer card here is NVS 510 (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $449-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3 | 1.5+15% |
| Codename | Chelsea | GM107 |
| Release | June 27 2012 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #752 | #826 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















