
FirePro M7740

Quadro FX 4700 X2
FirePro M7740 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M7740 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M7740 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M7740
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 490% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 4700 X2
2008Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌499.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M7740 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M7740
The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.

Quadro FX 4700 X2
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M7740 scores 665 and the Quadro FX 4700 X2 reaches 676 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M7740 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M7740) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 665 | 676+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+50% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M7740 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 4700 X2 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M7740 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4700 X2. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M7740) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the FirePro M7740 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M7740 draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 4700 X2's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The FirePro M7740 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M7740) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.2+349% | 4.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M7740 came in at $500, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 launched at $2999. On MSRP, FirePro M7740 was 83.3% cheaper ($2499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (FirePro M7740) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the FirePro M7740 offers 550% better value. The newer card here is FirePro M7740 (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-83% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3+550% | 0.2 |
| Codename | Chelsea | GT200B |
| Release | June 27 2012 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #752 | #884 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















