
FirePro M7740

GeForce GT 140
FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GT 140 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GT 140 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GT 140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M7740
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 64W, a 31W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌405.1% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
GeForce GT 140
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 399.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌93.9% higher power demand at 64W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GT 140 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M7740
The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.

GeForce GT 140
The GeForce GT 140 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 658 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M7740 scores 665 and the GeForce GT 140 reaches 658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M7740 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 140 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M7740) vs 384 (GeForce GT 140). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 140).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 665+1% | 658 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.7626 TFLOPS+10% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 140 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M7740 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M7740 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 140.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro M7740) vs 10.0 (GeForce GT 140). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro M7740) vs No (GeForce GT 140). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M7740) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 140).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M7740 draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 140's 64W — a 63.9% difference. The FirePro M7740 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M7740) vs 350W (GeForce GT 140). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-48% | 64W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.2+96% | 10.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M7740 came in at $500, while the GeForce GT 140 launched at $99. On MSRP, GeForce GT 140 was 80.2% cheaper ($401 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (FirePro M7740) vs 6.6 (GeForce GT 140) — the GeForce GT 140 offers 407.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 140 (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | GeForce GT 140 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $99-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3 | 6.6+408% |
| Codename | Chelsea | GK107 |
| Release | June 27 2012 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #752 | #777 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















