FirePro M7740 vs Intel UHD Graphics 610
FirePro M7740
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro M7740 is positioned at rank #329 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M7740
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M7740 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M7740 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 610 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M7740 and Intel UHD Graphics 610
FirePro M7740
The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 610
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 687 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M7740 scores 665 and the Intel UHD Graphics 610 reaches 687 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M7740 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 610 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M7740) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 610). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 610).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 665 | 687+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 512+178% | 184 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+63% | 0.4232 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 32+39% | 23 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M7740 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 610 has 0 MB. The FirePro M7740 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro M7740) vs 12 (12_1) (Intel UHD Graphics 610). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 (12_1)+19% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro M7740) vs Quick Sync Video (Intel UHD Graphics 610). Decoder: UVD 2 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M7740) vs H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,JPEG,VC-1 (Intel UHD Graphics 610).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Quick Sync Video |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | Quick Sync Video |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,JPEG,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M7740 draws 33W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 610's 15W — a 75% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M7740) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 610). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 15W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 20.2 | 45.8+127% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M7740 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Intel UHD Graphics 610 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 costs 100+% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.3 (FirePro M7740) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 610) — the Intel UHD Graphics 610 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M7740 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | Chelsea | Comet Lake GT2 |
| Release | June 27 2012 | October 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #752 | #824 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M7740 and Intel UHD Graphics 610
