Radeon HD 3450 vs GeForce GT 325M
Radeon HD 3450
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 325M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3450 is positioned at rank 273 and the GeForce GT 325M is on rank 274, so the Radeon HD 3450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3450
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 325M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 325M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3450 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 40.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3450 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+40.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3450 and GeForce GT 325M
Radeon HD 3450
The Radeon HD 3450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $199.
GeForce GT 325M
The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3450 scores 179 versus the GeForce GT 325M's 170 — the Radeon HD 3450 leads by 5.3%. The Radeon HD 3450 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce GT 325M uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 3450) vs 384 (GeForce GT 325M). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3450) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 179+5% | 170 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS+33% | 0.7526 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+400% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 3450 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 325M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 325M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3450 draws 110W versus the GeForce GT 325M's 50W — a 75% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3450) vs 350W (GeForce GT 325M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 50W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6 | 3.4+112% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3450 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.9 (Radeon HD 3450) vs 8.5 (GeForce GT 325M) — the Radeon HD 3450 offers 40% better value. The GeForce GT 325M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.9+40% | 8.5 |
| Codename | RV770 | GK107 |
| Release | June 25 2008 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #876 | #726 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 3450 and GeForce GT 325M
