
Radeon HD 3450 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4550

Radeon HD 3450
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon HD 4550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3450 is positioned at rank 273 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is on rank 530, so the Radeon HD 3450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3450
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 3450.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3450 | Mobility Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 4550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 6.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3450 | Mobility Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3450 and Mobility Radeon HD 4550

Radeon HD 3450
The Radeon HD 3450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $199.

Mobility Radeon HD 4550
The Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 191 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3450 scores 179 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4550's 191 — the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 leads by 6.7%. The Radeon HD 3450 is built on TeraScale while the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 3450) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4550). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3450) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4550).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | Mobility Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 179 | 191+7% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+12% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | Mobility Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | Mobility Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3450 draws 110W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4550's 50W — a 75% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3450) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4550). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | Mobility Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 50W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6 | 3.8+137% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3450 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 launched at $49 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.9 (Radeon HD 3450) vs 12.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 4550) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4550 offers 6.7% better value. The Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | Mobility Radeon HD 4550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $49-2% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.9 | 12.7+7% |
| Codename | RV770 | Broadway |
| Release | June 25 2008 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #876 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















