Radeon HD 3470 vs Radeon HD 2400
Radeon HD 3470
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 2400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3470 is positioned at rank 315 and the Radeon HD 2400 is on rank 323, so the Radeon HD 3470 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3470
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 2400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 3470.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3470 | Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 2400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 2400 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 55.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3470 | Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3470 and Radeon HD 2400
Radeon HD 3470
The Radeon HD 3470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 117 points. Launch price was $299.
Radeon HD 2400
The Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 3470 scores 117 and the Radeon HD 2400 reaches 121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3470 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 2400 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 3470) vs 800 (Radeon HD 2400). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3470) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3470 | Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 117 | 121+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.2 TFLOPS | 1.36 TFLOPS+13% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3470 | Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3470 | Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3470 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 2400's 190W — a 23.5% difference. The Radeon HD 3470 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3470) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2400). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3470 | Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8+33% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3470 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 2400 launched at $79 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 2400 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.8 (Radeon HD 3470) vs 12.1 (Radeon HD 2400) — the Radeon HD 2400 offers 55.1% better value. The Radeon HD 2400 is the newer GPU (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3470 | Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-24% | $79 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.8 | 12.1+55% |
| Codename | RV770 | RV790 |
| Release | June 25 2008 | April 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #784 | #762 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 3470 and Radeon HD 2400
