Radeon HD 3470
VS
Quadro FX 1400

Radeon HD 3470 vs Quadro FX 1400

AMD

Radeon HD 3470

2008Core: 750 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

2008Core: 602 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3470 is positioned at rank 315 and the Quadro FX 1400 is on rank 410, so the Radeon HD 3470 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3470

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
3720%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3574%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
3532%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3526%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3519%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
3499%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
3455%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3442%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3410%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
3401%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
3360%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3353%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
3292%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3290%
#300
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
4103%
#315
Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#316
Radeon HD 3000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#317
GeForce GT 120
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
96%
#318
Radeon HD 6250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#319
GeForce 6600 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
87%
#320
Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
87%
#321
Radeon HD 3200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
84%
#322
Radeon HD 2350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $48
79%
#323
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
78%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
77%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
71%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
67%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
59%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
57%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1400

#395
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
92331%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
100%
#411
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
100%
#413
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
75%
#414
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
63%
#417
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
56%
#418
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
50%
#419
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
50%
#420
Quadro FX 1000
MSRP: $500|Avg: $30
44%
#421
Quadro FX 1300
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
38%
#422
Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50
38%
#423
Quadro FX 4000
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50
31%
#424
RADEON IGP 320
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
25%
#425
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
13%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 3470 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 3470Quadro FX 1400
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-6%)
Leading raw performance (+6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 3470 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3470 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 88.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 3470Quadro FX 1400
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+88.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3470 and Quadro FX 1400

AMD

Radeon HD 3470

The Radeon HD 3470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 117 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3470 scores 117 versus the Quadro FX 1400's 124 — the Quadro FX 1400 leads by 6%. The Radeon HD 3470 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 3470) vs 192 (Quadro FX 1400). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3470) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400).

FeatureRadeon HD 3470Quadro FX 1400
G3D Mark Score
117
124+6%
Architecture
TeraScale
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
800+317%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.2 TFLOPS+160%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
24+50%
TMUs
40
64+60%
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 3470Quadro FX 1400
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 3470 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1400 has 128 MB. The Radeon HD 3470 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 3470) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 1400) — the Radeon HD 3470 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 3470Quadro FX 1400
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3470 draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 1400's 150W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3470) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1400). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 3470Quadro FX 1400
TDP
150W
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
0.8
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 3470 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro FX 1400 launched at $799 and now averages $30. The Radeon HD 3470 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.8 (Radeon HD 3470) vs 4.1 (Quadro FX 1400) — the Radeon HD 3470 offers 90.2% better value.

FeatureRadeon HD 3470Quadro FX 1400
MSRP
$60-92%
$799
Avg Price (30d)
$15-50%
$30
Performance per Dollar
7.8+90%
4.1
Codename
RV770
GT200B
Release
June 25 2008
November 11 2008
Ranking
#784
#884