GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VS
Quadro FX 1400

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Quadro FX 1400

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

2008Core: 602 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
111%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
110%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
110%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
110%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
109%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
109%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
107%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
105%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
104%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
104%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
104%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
103%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
102%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
101%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
101%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
100%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
98%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
98%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
96%
#48
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $499|Avg: $449
95%
#49
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP: $549|Avg: $540
94%
#50
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
MSRP: $599|Avg: $600
93%
#51
Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $490
92%
#52
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $340
92%
#53
GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP: $599|Avg: $550
91%
#54
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
MSRP: $279|Avg: $380
91%
#55
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
MSRP: $470|Avg: $120
90%
#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
89%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1400

#395
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
92331%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
100%
#411
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
100%
#413
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
75%
#414
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
63%
#417
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
56%
#418
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
50%
#419
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
50%
#420
Quadro FX 1000
MSRP: $500|Avg: $30
44%
#421
Quadro FX 1300
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
38%
#422
Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50
38%
#423
Quadro FX 4000
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50
31%
#424
RADEON IGP 320
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
25%
#425
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
13%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25366.1% higher G3D Mark score and 9500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1400.

InsightGeForce RTX 4070 TiQuadro FX 1400
Performance
Leading raw performance (+25366.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-25366.1%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (285mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1194.9% better value per dollar than the Quadro FX 1400.

InsightGeForce RTX 4070 TiQuadro FX 1400
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1194.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Quadro FX 1400

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1400

The Quadro FX 1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Quadro FX 1400's 124 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 25366.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro FX 1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 192 (Quadro FX 1400). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1400).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiQuadro FX 1400
G3D Mark Score
31,578+25366%
124
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
4 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
7680+3900%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
40.09 TFLOPS+8572%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
80+233%
24
TMUs
240+275%
64
L2 Cache
48 MB+25163%
0.19 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro FX 1400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro FX 1400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiQuadro FX 1400
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1400 has 128 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 9500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 1400) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiQuadro FX 1400
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+9500%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
48 MB+25163%
0.19 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Quadro FX 1400's 150W — a 62.1% difference. The Quadro FX 1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiQuadro FX 1400
TDP
285W
150W-47%
Recommended PSU
700W
350W-50%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
285mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
110.8+13750%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Quadro FX 1400 launched at $799 and now averages $30. The Quadro FX 1400 costs 94.9% less ($560 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4.1 (Quadro FX 1400) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1204.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiQuadro FX 1400
MSRP
$799
$799
Avg Price (30d)
$590
$30-95%
Performance per Dollar
53.5+1205%
4.1
Codename
AD104
GT200B
Release
January 3 2023
November 11 2008
Ranking
#11
#884