CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Popular choices:
GeForce 9600M GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is positioned at rank 650 and the GeForce 9600M GT is on rank 640, so the GeForce 9600M GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9600M GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9600M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 3650 AGP.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3650 AGP | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9600M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9600M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 8.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3650 AGP | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+8.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3650 AGP and GeForce 9600M GT
Radeon HD 3650 AGP
The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 150 points.
GeForce 9600M GT
The GeForce 9600M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3650 AGP scores 150 versus the GeForce 9600M GT's 163 — the GeForce 9600M GT leads by 8.7%. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 9600M GT uses G9x, both on 40 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 224 (GeForce 9600M GT).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3650 AGP | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 150 | 163+9% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | G9x |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+114% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3650 AGP | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3650 AGP | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3650 AGP draws 45W versus the GeForce 9600M GT's 150W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 350W (GeForce 9600M GT). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3650 AGP | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-70% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.3+200% | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3650 AGP launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 9600M GT launched at $80 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.5 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 8.2 (GeForce 9600M GT) — the GeForce 9600M GT offers 9.3% better value. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3650 AGP | GeForce 9600M GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $80 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.5 | 8.2+9% |
| Codename | Onega | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | April 19 2011 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #926 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 3650 AGP and GeForce 9600M GT
