Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs Radeon HD 8350

AMD

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8350

2012Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs Radeon HD 8350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs Radeon HD 8350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs Radeon HD 8350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $120 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 130.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8350

2012

Why buy it

  • 45.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • 188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 8.7% in PassMark G3D (163 vs 150), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 3650 AGP is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3650 AGP makes the most sense to buy today. It is $120 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 130.1% (1.9 vs 0.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 8350 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs Radeon HD 8350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 150 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8350

The Radeon HD 8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3650 AGP scores 150 versus the Radeon HD 8350's 163 — the Radeon HD 8350 leads by 8.7%. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 8350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8350). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8350).

FeatureRadeon HD 3650 AGPRadeon HD 8350
G3D Mark Score
150
163+9%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
1024+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+206%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L1 Cache
48 KB
256 KB+433%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 3650 AGPRadeon HD 8350
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3650 AGP and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8350. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8350) — the Radeon HD 8350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 3650 AGPRadeon HD 8350
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3650 AGP draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 8350's 130W — a 97.1% difference. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8350). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 3650 AGPRadeon HD 8350
TDP
45W-65%
130W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
3.3+154%
1.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 3650 AGP came in at $80, while the Radeon HD 8350 launched at $200. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3650 AGP was 60% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 0.8 (Radeon HD 8350) — the Radeon HD 3650 AGP offers 137.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8350 (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 3650 AGPRadeon HD 8350
MSRP
$80-60%
$200
Performance per Dollar
1.9+137%
0.8
Codename
Onega
Pitcairn
Release
April 19 2011
March 5 2012
Ranking
#926
#503

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.