GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP

NVIDIA

GeForce 8200

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8200

2014

Why buy it

  • 36.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $40 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • Delivers 118.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 45W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 8200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% HIGHER MSRP
    $80 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
  • 36.4% higher power demand at 45W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 8200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 9.3% in PassMark G3D (164 vs 150), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 8200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $40 vs $80, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 118.7% (4.1 vs 1.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8200

The GeForce 8200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 164 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 150 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8200 scores 164 versus the Radeon HD 3650 AGP's 150 — the GeForce 8200 leads by 9.3%. The GeForce 8200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8200) vs 480 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3650 AGP).

FeatureGeForce 8200Radeon HD 3650 AGP
G3D Mark Score
164+9%
150
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
256
480+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5888 TFLOPS+2%
0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
16
24+50%
L1 Cache
128 KB+167%
48 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 8200Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8200 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3650 AGP. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) — the GeForce 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8200Radeon HD 3650 AGP
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8200 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 3650 AGP's 45W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 8200Radeon HD 3650 AGP
TDP
33W-27%
45W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
5.0+52%
3.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8200 came in at $40, while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP launched at $80. On MSRP, GeForce 8200 was 50% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (GeForce 8200) vs 1.9 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) — the GeForce 8200 offers 115.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8200 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 8200Radeon HD 3650 AGP
MSRP
$40-50%
$80
Performance per Dollar
4.1+116%
1.9
Codename
GM108
Onega
Release
July 22 2014
April 19 2011
Ranking
#832
#926

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.