
GeForce 8200

GeForce 8500 GT
GeForce 8200 vs GeForce 8500 GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8200 vs GeForce 8500 GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8200 vs GeForce 8500 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8500 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce 8500 GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅6.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌122.5% HIGHER MSRP$89 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8200 vs GeForce 8500 GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8200
The GeForce 8200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 164 points.

GeForce 8500 GT
The GeForce 8500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8200 scores 164 and the GeForce 8500 GT reaches 169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8200 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 8500 GT uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8200) vs 224 (GeForce 8500 GT).
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 164 | 169+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 256+14% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8500 GT carries 1 GB. GeForce 8500 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8200 and 64-bit on the GeForce 8500 GT.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8200) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8500 GT). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8200) vs No (GeForce 8500 GT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8200) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8500 GT).
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8200 draws 33W versus the GeForce 8500 GT's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200) vs 350W (GeForce 8500 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 173mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.0+355% | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8200 came in at $40, while the GeForce 8500 GT launched at $89. On MSRP, GeForce 8200 was 55.1% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (GeForce 8200) vs 1.9 (GeForce 8500 GT) — the GeForce 8200 offers 115.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8200 (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce 8500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40-55% | $89 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1+116% | 1.9 |
| Codename | GM108 | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | July 22 2014 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #832 | #825 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














