GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HDG 4670

CPU

GPU

GeForce 8200

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon HDG 4670

2010Boost: 880 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HDG 4670 Performance Spectrum

GeForce 8200

0.5 GB 33

164

0.0%

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

Radeon HDG 4670

0.5 GB 250

170

+3.7%

Radeon HD 6250

Radeon HD 7290

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

Mobility Radeon HD 4570

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HDG 4670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HDG 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8200

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $27 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
✅Delivers 61.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 250W, a 217W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HDG 4670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HDG 4670

2010

Why buy it

✅7.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
67.5% HIGHER MSRP
$67 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
❌657.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HDG 4670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (170 vs 164), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 8200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $27 cheaper on MSRP at $40 vs $67, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 61.6% (4.1 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HDG 4670 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HDG 4670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8200

The GeForce 8200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 164 points.

Radeon HDG 4670

The Radeon HDG 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8200 scores 164 and the Radeon HDG 4670 reaches 170 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HDG 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8200) vs 1,536 (Radeon HDG 4670). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HDG 4670). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 880 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HDG 4670
G3D Mark Score	164	170+4%
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	256	1536+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5888 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+359%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz+31%	880 MHz
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	16	96+500%
L1 Cache	128 KB	192 KB+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HDG 4670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HDG 4670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8200 and 128-bit on the Radeon HDG 4670. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HDG 4670) — the GeForce 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HDG 4670
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8200) vs 10.1 (Radeon HDG 4670). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HDG 4670
DirectX	10.0	10.1
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8200) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HDG 4670). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HDG 4670
Encoder	No	UVD 2
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	UVD 2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8200 draws 33W versus the Radeon HDG 4670's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200) vs 350W (Radeon HDG 4670). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 193mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HDG 4670
TDP	33W-87%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	193mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	5.0+614%	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8200 came in at $40, while the Radeon HDG 4670 launched at $67. On MSRP, GeForce 8200 was 40.3% cheaper ($27 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (GeForce 8200) vs 2.5 (Radeon HDG 4670) — the GeForce 8200 offers 64% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8200 (2014 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HDG 4670
MSRP	$40-40%	$67
Performance per Dollar	4.1+64%	2.5
Codename	GM108	Cayman
Release	July 22 2014	December 14 2010
Ranking	#832	#596

Search GeForce 8200 on Amazon

Search Radeon HDG 4670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.