GeForce 8200 vs GeForce GT 325M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8200 vs GeForce GT 325M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8200 vs GeForce GT 325M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8200

2014

Why buy it

✅10.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GT 325M

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 325M instead at 170 vs 164, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 8200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 8200 vs GeForce GT 325M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8200

The GeForce 8200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 164 points.

GeForce GT 325M

The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8200 scores 164 and the GeForce GT 325M reaches 170 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8200 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 325M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8200) vs 384 (GeForce GT 325M). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M).

Feature	GeForce 8200	GeForce GT 325M
G3D Mark Score	164	170+4%
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5888 TFLOPS	0.7526 TFLOPS+28%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	32+100%
L1 Cache	128 KB+300%	32 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 8200	GeForce GT 325M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 325M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 325M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8200 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 325M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 325M) — the GeForce 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 8200	GeForce GT 325M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8200) vs 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 325M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 8200	GeForce GT 325M
DirectX	10.0	11 (10_1)+10%
OpenGL	3.3+3%	3.2
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8200) vs CUDA (GeForce GT 325M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8200) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 325M).

Feature	GeForce 8200	GeForce GT 325M
Encoder	No	CUDA
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	PureVideo VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8200 draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 325M's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200) vs 350W (GeForce GT 325M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 8200	GeForce GT 325M
TDP	33W-34%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	5.0+47%	3.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 8200 (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce 8200	GeForce GT 325M
MSRP	$40	—
Codename	GM108	GK107
Release	July 22 2014	June 25 2013
Ranking	#832	#726

Search GeForce 8200 on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 325M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.