
GeForce 8200

Radeon HD 3670
GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 3670 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 3670 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 3670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 142.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 250W, a 217W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 3670
2010Why buy it
- ✅7.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
- ❌657.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 3670 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8200
The GeForce 8200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 164 points.

Radeon HD 3670
The Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8200 scores 164 and the Radeon HD 3670 reaches 169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 3670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8200) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 3670). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3670). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 164 | 169+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1536+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+359% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+31% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 96+500% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8200 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3670. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3670) — the GeForce 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8200) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3670). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8200) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3670). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8200 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 3670's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3670). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-87% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.0+614% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8200 came in at $40, while the Radeon HD 3670 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 8200 was 60% cheaper ($60 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (GeForce 8200) vs 1.7 (Radeon HD 3670) — the GeForce 8200 offers 141.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8200 (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40-60% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1+141% | 1.7 |
| Codename | GM108 | Cayman |
| Release | July 22 2014 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #832 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














