Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce 8200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce 8200

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

2010Core: 700 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce 8200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 Performance Spectrum

GeForce 8200
0.5 GB 33
164
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 8600M GS
brand logoGeForce Go 6800
brand logoGeForce 9300
brand logoGeForce GT 130M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1630
brand logoGeForce GTX 970
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
0.25 GB 50
168
+2.4%
brand logoRadeon HD 6250
brand logoRadeon HD 7290
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON X1800
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 4350
brand logoRadeon R9 270X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8200

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 144% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • ✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    150% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
  • ❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (168 vs 164), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 8200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $60 cheaper on MSRP at $40 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 144% (4.1 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Mobility Radeon HD 2600 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 8200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8200

The GeForce 8200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 164 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2600

The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8200 scores 164 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 reaches 168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8200 is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8200) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2600).

FeatureGeForce 8200Mobility Radeon HD 2600
G3D Mark Score
164
168+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
256
800+213%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5888 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+90%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
40+150%
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 8200Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 carries 256 MB. GeForce 8200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8200 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) — the GeForce 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8200Mobility Radeon HD 2600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8200) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8200Mobility Radeon HD 2600
DirectX
10.0
10.0
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8200) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs Avivo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8200) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600).

FeatureGeForce 8200Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Encoder
No
Avivo HD
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
Avivo HD
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8200 draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2600's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce 8200Mobility Radeon HD 2600
TDP
33W-34%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
—
Height
0mm
—
Slots
0
—
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
5.0+47%
3.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8200 came in at $40, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 8200 was 60% cheaper ($60 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (GeForce 8200) vs 1.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) — the GeForce 8200 offers 141.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8200 (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce 8200Mobility Radeon HD 2600
MSRP
$40-60%
$100
Performance per Dollar
4.1+141%
1.7
Codename
GM108
Broadway
Release
July 22 2014
January 7 2010
Ranking
#832
#846
Search GeForce 8200 on AmazonSearch Mobility Radeon HD 2600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.