GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 8350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 8350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 8350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8200

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 403.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 130W, a 97W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8350

2012

Why buy it

✅6.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
400% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
❌293.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 8200 instead at 164 vs 163, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 8200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $160 cheaper on MSRP at $40 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 403.1% (4.1 vs 0.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 8350 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 8200 vs Radeon HD 8350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8200

The GeForce 8200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 164 points.

Radeon HD 8350

The Radeon HD 8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8200 scores 164 and the Radeon HD 8350 reaches 163 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8350 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8200) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8350). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8350). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HD 8350
G3D Mark Score	164	163
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	1024+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5888 TFLOPS	1.761 TFLOPS+199%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz+15%	1000 MHz
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	16	64+300%
L1 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HD 8350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8200 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8350. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8350) — the GeForce 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HD 8350
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8200 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 8350's 130W — a 119% difference. The GeForce 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8350). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HD 8350
TDP	33W-75%	130W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	5.0+285%	1.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8200 came in at $40, while the Radeon HD 8350 launched at $200. On MSRP, GeForce 8200 was 80% cheaper ($160 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (GeForce 8200) vs 0.8 (Radeon HD 8350) — the GeForce 8200 offers 412.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8200 (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce 8200	Radeon HD 8350
MSRP	$40-80%	$200
Performance per Dollar	4.1+412%	0.8
Codename	GM108	Pitcairn
Release	July 22 2014	March 5 2012
Ranking	#832	#503

Search GeForce 8200 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.