GeForce 8400 GS
VS
Radeon HD 3650 AGP

GeForce 8400 GS vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400 GS

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

2011Core: 600 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8400 GS is positioned at rank 461 and the Radeon HD 3650 AGP is on rank 650, so the GeForce 8400 GS offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400 GS

#450
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1999%
#452
1813%
#453
1808%
#457
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1644%
#458
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1633%
#460
Mobility Radeon HD 550v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#461
GeForce 8400 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
100%
#462
Radeon HD 8280G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#463
Radeon R7 M340
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
99%
#464
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
99%
#465
98%
#466
Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#467
Radeon R5 M230
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
98%
#468
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#469
Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#470
Radeon R9 M370X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
96%
#471
Radeon HD 8280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#472
GeForce GTX 850A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
94%
#473
94%
#474
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
94%
#475
Radeon R7 A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: $118
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3650 AGP

#638
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
5775%
#640
5235%
#641
5221%
#645
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4748%
#646
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4715%
#648
GeForce 9400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#649
Mobility Radeon X1600
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#650
Radeon HD 3650 AGP
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
100%
#651
GeForce 9600M GS
MSRP: $70|Avg: $20
99%
#652
Mobility Radeon HD 4200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $45
99%
#653
Mobility Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#654
GeForce 8800 GT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $25
98%
#655
GeForce 8400
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
96%
#656
GeForce 9800M GTS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
95%
#657
95%
#658
GeForce 8600 GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
95%
#659
Radeon HD 2900 GT
MSRP: $170|Avg: $15
91%
#660
Radeon HD 8280E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $110
91%
#661
Radeon R5 M420
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
89%
#662
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
89%
#663
Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 8400 GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 3650 AGP.

InsightGeForce 8400 GSRadeon HD 3650 AGP
Performance
Leading raw performance (+8.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-8.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 3650 AGP offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3650 AGP holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 38% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 8400 GSRadeon HD 3650 AGP
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+38%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400 GS and Radeon HD 3650 AGP

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400 GS

The GeForce 8400 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 150 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 GS scores 163 versus the Radeon HD 3650 AGP's 150 — the GeForce 8400 GS leads by 8.7%. The GeForce 8400 GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 480 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3650 AGP).

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSRadeon HD 3650 AGP
G3D Mark Score
163+9%
150
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS+50%
0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
16
24+50%
L1 Cache
192 KB+300%
48 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSRadeon HD 3650 AGP
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) — the GeForce 8400 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSRadeon HD 3650 AGP
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400 GS draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 3650 AGP's 45W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce 8400 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSRadeon HD 3650 AGP
TDP
33W-27%
45W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
170mm
Height
106mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
4.9+48%
3.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8400 GS launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP launched at $80 and now averages $20. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.4 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 7.5 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) — the Radeon HD 3650 AGP offers 38.9% better value. The GeForce 8400 GS is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSRadeon HD 3650 AGP
MSRP
$30-63%
$80
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$20-33%
Performance per Dollar
5.4
7.5+39%
Codename
GM108
Onega
Release
March 17 2014
April 19 2011
Ranking
#850
#926