GeForce 8400 GS
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
GeForce 8400 GS vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400 GS vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 8400 GS vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400 GS
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400 GS vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 8400 GS
The GeForce 8400 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8400 GS scores 163 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 reaches 168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400 GS is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2600).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 163 | 168+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+30% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 40+150% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+140% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8400 GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400 GS has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 carries 256 MB. GeForce 8400 GS gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 GS and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2600. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) — the GeForce 8400 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400 GS) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs Avivo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | Avivo HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400 GS draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2600's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8400 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-34% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 106mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+44% | 3.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8400 GS came in at $30, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 8400 GS was 70% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 1.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600) — the GeForce 8400 GS offers 217.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8400 GS (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-70% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4+218% | 1.7 |
| Codename | GM108 | Broadway |
| Release | March 17 2014 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #850 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8400 GS and Mobility Radeon HD 2600
