GeForce 8400 GS vs Radeon HD 7310M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8400 GS vs Radeon HD 7310M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8400 GS vs Radeon HD 7310M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8400 GS

2014

Why buy it

✅11.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 47W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 7310M

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8400 GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
❌42.4% higher power demand at 47W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8400 GS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7310M instead at 166 vs 163, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8400 GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 8400 GS makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 8400 GS vs Radeon HD 7310M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400 GS

The GeForce 8400 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.

Radeon HD 7310M

The Radeon HD 7310M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 166 points. Launch price was $59.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400 GS scores 163 and the Radeon HD 7310M reaches 166 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400 GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7310M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 384 (Radeon HD 7310M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7310M).

Feature	GeForce 8400 GS	Radeon HD 7310M
G3D Mark Score	163	166+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS+40%	0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	24+50%
L1 Cache	192 KB+100%	96 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8400 GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7310M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8400 GS	Radeon HD 7310M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 GS and System on the Radeon HD 7310M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7310M) — the GeForce 8400 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 8400 GS	Radeon HD 7310M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400 GS draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 7310M's 47W — a 35% difference. The GeForce 8400 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7310M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 8400 GS	Radeon HD 7310M
TDP	33W-30%	47W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	170mm	—
Height	106mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.9+40%	3.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 8400 GS (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce 8400 GS	Radeon HD 7310M
MSRP	$30	—
Codename	GM108	Cape Verde
Release	March 17 2014	May 1 2013
Ranking	#850	#841

Search GeForce 8400 GS on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7310M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.