GeForce 8400 GS
VS
GeForce 9200

GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce 9200

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400 GS

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9200

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8400 GS is positioned at rank 461 and the GeForce 9200 is on rank 562, so the GeForce 8400 GS offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400 GS

#451
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1999%
#453
1813%
#454
1808%
#458
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1644%
#459
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1633%
#461
GeForce 8400 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
100%
#462
Mobility Radeon HD 550v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#463
Radeon HD 8280G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#464
Radeon R7 M340
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
99%
#465
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
99%
#466
98%
#467
Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#468
Radeon R5 M230
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
98%
#469
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#470
Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#471
Radeon R9 M370X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
96%
#472
Radeon HD 8280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#473
GeForce GTX 850A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
94%
#474
94%
#475
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
94%
#476
Radeon R7 A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: $118
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9200

#551
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3231%
#553
2929%
#554
2921%
#558
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2657%
#559
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2638%
#561
100%
#562
GeForce 9200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#563
Radeon R7 M265DX
MSRP: $149|Avg: $40
100%
#564
Radeon R9 M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#566
98%
#567
98%
#568
98%
#569
98%
#570
Radeon R5 M315
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#571
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
MSRP: $599|Avg: $300
97%
#572
GeForce 9400 GT
MSRP: $59|Avg: $20
96%
#573
96%
#574
GeForce 240M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
95%
#575
95%
#576
GeForce 310
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 9200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8400 GS.

InsightGeForce 8400 GSGeForce 9200
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%)
Leading raw performance (+3.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 106.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 8400 GSGeForce 9200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+106.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400 GS and GeForce 9200

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400 GS

The GeForce 8400 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9200

The GeForce 9200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400 GS scores 163 and the GeForce 9200 reaches 168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400 GS is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 256 (GeForce 9200). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 993 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce 9200
G3D Mark Score
163
168+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+50%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS+70%
0.5084 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1124 MHz+13%
993 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
16
24+50%
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce 9200
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce 9200
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9200). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce 9200
DirectX
10.0
10.0
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400 GS) vs None (GeForce 9200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD (VP2). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9200).

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce 9200
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD (VP2)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400 GS draws 33W versus the GeForce 9200's 16W — a 69.4% difference. The GeForce 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 350W (GeForce 9200). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70.

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce 9200
TDP
33W
16W-52%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
170mm
0mm
Height
106mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-7%
70
Perf/Watt
4.9
10.5+114%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8400 GS launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce 9200 launched at $50 and now averages $15. The GeForce 9200 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.4 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 11.2 (GeForce 9200) — the GeForce 9200 offers 107.4% better value. The GeForce 9200 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce 9200
MSRP
$30-40%
$50
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$15-50%
Performance per Dollar
5.4
11.2+107%
Codename
GM108
GM108
Release
March 17 2014
March 25 2016
Ranking
#850
#864