GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G210

2017

Why buy it

✅6.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 57.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 45W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce G210 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
60% HIGHER MSRP
$80 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 45W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce G210 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 3650 AGP instead at 150 vs 148, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce G210 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce G210 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $80, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 57.9% (3.0 vs 1.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 3650 AGP Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G210

The GeForce G210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 150 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G210 scores 148 and the Radeon HD 3650 AGP reaches 150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G210 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G210) vs 480 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G210) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3650 AGP).

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 3650 AGP
G3D Mark Score	148	150+1%
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS+96%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	144 KB+200%	48 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G210 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G210 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3650 AGP. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce G210) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) — the GeForce G210 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 3650 AGP
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 3650 AGP's 45W — a 40% difference. The GeForce G210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3650 AGP). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 3650 AGP
TDP	30W-33%	45W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	100	—
Perf/Watt	4.9+48%	3.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce G210 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 3650 AGP launched at $80. On MSRP, GeForce G210 was 37.5% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce G210) vs 1.9 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) — the GeForce G210 offers 57.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce G210 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 3650 AGP
MSRP	$50-38%	$80
Performance per Dollar	3.0+58%	1.9
Codename	GP108	Onega
Release	May 17 2017	April 19 2011
Ranking	#641	#926

Search GeForce G210 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 3650 AGP on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.