
GeForce 8400 GS

GeForce G210
GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce G210 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce G210 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce G210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400 GS
2014Why buy it
- ✅30.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce G210
2017Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8400 GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% HIGHER MSRP$50 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce G210 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400 GS
The GeForce 8400 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.

GeForce G210
The GeForce G210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 GS scores 163 versus the GeForce G210's 148 — the GeForce 8400 GS leads by 10.1%. The GeForce 8400 GS is built on Maxwell while the GeForce G210 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 384 (GeForce G210). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G210). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce G210 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 163+10% | 148 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1468 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+33% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce G210 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 GS and 128-bit on the GeForce G210. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce G210) — the GeForce 8400 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce G210 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce G210). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce G210 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.1 (10_1)+11% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400 GS) vs None (GeForce G210). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce G210).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce G210 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400 GS draws 33W versus the GeForce G210's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce G210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 350W (GeForce G210). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 100.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce G210 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | 168mm |
| Height | 106mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-35% | 100 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9 | 4.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8400 GS came in at $30, while the GeForce G210 launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce 8400 GS was 40% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 3.0 (GeForce G210) — the GeForce 8400 GS offers 80% better value. The newer card here is GeForce G210 (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce G210 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4+80% | 3.0 |
| Codename | GM108 | GP108 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #850 | #641 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














