
GeForce G210

Radeon R5 220
GeForce G210 vs Radeon R5 220 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce G210 vs Radeon R5 220 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce G210 vs Radeon R5 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce G210
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 275W, a 245W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 220 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌42.9% HIGHER MSRP$50 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
Radeon R5 220
2013Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌816.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce G210 vs Radeon R5 220 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G210
The GeForce G210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon R5 220
The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce G210 scores 148 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G210 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G210) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G210) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220).
| Feature | GeForce G210 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 148 | 147 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 4.849 TFLOPS+330% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 160+567% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 640 KB+344% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce G210 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 220 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce G210 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce G210 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 220 carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 220 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G210 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 220. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce G210) vs 1 MB (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce G210 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce G210) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 220). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce G210 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce G210) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 220). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce G210 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G210 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 160.7% difference. The GeForce G210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce G210 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-89% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 100 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+880% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce G210 came in at $50, while the Radeon R5 220 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon R5 220 was 30% cheaper ($15 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce G210) vs 4.2 (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 40% better value. The newer card here is GeForce G210 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce G210 | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $35-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.0 | 4.2+40% |
| Codename | GP108 | Hawaii |
| Release | May 17 2017 | November 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #641 | #316 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














