GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 6320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 6320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 6320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G210

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 186W, a 156W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6320 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
66.7% HIGHER MSRP
$50 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.

Radeon HD 6320

2011

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Delivers 65.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌520% higher power demand at 186W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6320 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce G210 instead at 148 vs 147, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce G210 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6320 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 65.5% (4.9 vs 3.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6320 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G210 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 6320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G210

The GeForce G210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 6320

The Radeon HD 6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G210 scores 148 and the Radeon HD 6320 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G210 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 6320 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G210) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G210) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320).

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 6320
G3D Mark Score	148	147
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 3
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	1.92 TFLOPS+70%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L1 Cache	144 KB	320 KB+122%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G210 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 6320
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G210 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6320.

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 6320
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce G210) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 6320
DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	11.2
OpenGL	3.3	4.5+36%
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce G210) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6320). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce G210) vs H.264,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6320).

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 6320
Encoder	None	UVD 3
Decoder	VP4	UVD 3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6320's 186W — a 144.4% difference. The GeForce G210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 6320
TDP	30W-84%	186W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	1mm
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	100	—
Perf/Watt	4.9+513%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce G210 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 6320 launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6320 was 40% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce G210) vs 4.9 (Radeon HD 6320) — the Radeon HD 6320 offers 63.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce G210 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce G210	Radeon HD 6320
MSRP	$50	$30-40%
Performance per Dollar	3.0	4.9+63%
Codename	GP108	Cayman
Release	May 17 2017	December 1 2011
Ranking	#641	#598

Search GeForce G210 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.