GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 8350

NVIDIA

GeForce G210

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8350

2012Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 8350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 8350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 8350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G210

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 263.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 130W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8350

2012

Why buy it

  • 36.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 300% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 10.1% in PassMark G3D (163 vs 148), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce G210 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce G210 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 263.2% (3.0 vs 0.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 8350 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce G210 vs Radeon HD 8350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce G210

The GeForce G210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon HD 8350

The Radeon HD 8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce G210 scores 148 versus the Radeon HD 8350's 163 — the Radeon HD 8350 leads by 10.1%. The GeForce G210 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 8350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G210) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8350). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G210) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8350). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce G210Radeon HD 8350
G3D Mark Score
148
163+10%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+56%
Boost Clock
1468 MHz+47%
1000 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L1 Cache
144 KB
256 KB+78%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G210 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce G210Radeon HD 8350
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G210 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8350.

FeatureGeForce G210Radeon HD 8350
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 8350's 130W — a 125% difference. The GeForce G210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8350). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce G210Radeon HD 8350
TDP
30W-77%
130W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
100
Perf/Watt
4.9+277%
1.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce G210 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 8350 launched at $200. On MSRP, GeForce G210 was 75% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce G210) vs 0.8 (Radeon HD 8350) — the GeForce G210 offers 275% better value. The newer card here is GeForce G210 (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce G210Radeon HD 8350
MSRP
$50-75%
$200
Performance per Dollar
3.0+275%
0.8
Codename
GP108
Pitcairn
Release
May 17 2017
March 5 2012
Ranking
#641
#503

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.