GeForce G210 vs Quadro FX 380 LP

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G210 vs Quadro FX 380 LP FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G210 vs Quadro FX 380 LP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G210

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Delivers 245% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 189W, a 159W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 380 LP across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 380 LP

2008

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
238% HIGHER MSRP
$169 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌530% higher power demand at 189W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 380 LP is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce G210 instead at 148 vs 145, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce G210 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce G210 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $119 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 245% (3.0 vs 0.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 380 LP still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce G210 vs Quadro FX 380 LP Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G210

The GeForce G210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $79.

Quadro FX 380 LP

The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G210 scores 148 and the Quadro FX 380 LP reaches 145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G210 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 380 LP uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G210) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G210) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP).

Feature	GeForce G210	Quadro FX 380 LP
G3D Mark Score	148+2%	145
Architecture	Pascal	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS+81%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G210 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 380 LP leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G210	Quadro FX 380 LP
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G210 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380 LP. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce G210) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 380 LP) — the GeForce G210 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce G210	Quadro FX 380 LP
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210 draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 380 LP's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The GeForce G210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce G210	Quadro FX 380 LP
TDP	30W-84%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	100	—
Perf/Watt	4.9+513%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce G210 came in at $50, while the Quadro FX 380 LP launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce G210 was 70.4% cheaper ($119 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce G210) vs 0.9 (Quadro FX 380 LP) — the GeForce G210 offers 233.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce G210 (2017 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce G210	Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP	$50-70%	$169
Performance per Dollar	3.0+233%	0.9
Codename	GP108	GT200B
Release	May 17 2017	November 11 2008
Ranking	#641	#815

Search GeForce G210 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 380 LP on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.