CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 3850 X2
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 617
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is positioned at rank #303 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3850 X2
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The Intel UHD Graphics 617 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 3850 X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 617.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 3850 X2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3850 X2 and Intel UHD Graphics 617
Radeon HD 3850 X2
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 960 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 254W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 822 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 617
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 scores 822 and the Intel UHD Graphics 617 reaches 819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 617).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 822 | 819 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 ×2+400% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS ×2+281% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+967% | 3 |
| TMUs | 48 ×2+100% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 3850 X2 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12_1+19% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD+ vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD+ | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 draws 254W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 617's 15W — a 177.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 254W | 15W-94% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 54.6+1606% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $349, while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 costs 100+% less ($349 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.4 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 617) — the Intel UHD Graphics 617 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $349 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | Barts | Amber Lake GT2 |
| Release | September 19 2011 | November 7 2018 |
| Ranking | #630 | #921 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 3850 X2 and Intel UHD Graphics 617
