Radeon HD 3850 X2
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
Radeon HD 3850 X2 vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 3850 X2 vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 3850 X2 vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 3850 X2
2011Why buy it
- ✅12.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 3850 X2 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1593.3% higher power demand at 254W vs 15W.
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 254W, a 239W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3850 X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3850 X2 vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon HD 3850 X2
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 960 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 254W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 822 points.
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 scores 822 and the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U reaches 832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U uses Vega, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 512 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 822 | 832+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Vega |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 ×2+88% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.843 TFLOPS+20% |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48 ×2+50% | 32 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U carries 0 MB. Radeon HD 3850 X2 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3850 X2 and System on the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 (12_1)+19% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD+ vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD+ | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 draws 254W versus the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U's 15W — a 177.7% difference. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 254W | 15W-94% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 55.5+1634% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 3850 X2 came in at $349, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U was 100+% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) — the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 X2 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | Barts | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | September 19 2011 | October 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #630 | #721 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 3850 X2 and Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
