
GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 3850 X2

GeForce 920A
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 3850 X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 920A is positioned at rank 396 and the Radeon HD 3850 X2 is on rank 303, so the Radeon HD 3850 X2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920A
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3850 X2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 920A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 3850 X2 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 920A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 920A holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $349), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2246.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2246.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($349) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920A and Radeon HD 3850 X2

GeForce 920A
The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.

Radeon HD 3850 X2
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 960 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 254W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 822 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920A scores 829 and the Radeon HD 3850 X2 reaches 822 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 3850 X2 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 960 (Radeon HD 3850 X2). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A) vs 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 3850 X2).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 829 | 822 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 960 ×2+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS ×2+113% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 ×2+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 920A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3850 X2 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 3850 X2 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920A) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3850 X2) — the GeForce 920A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 920A) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3850 X2). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+9% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5+36% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD+. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 920A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 3850 X2).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD+ |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 3850 X2's 254W — a 154% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 450W (Radeon HD 3850 X2). Power connectors: Legacy vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-87% | 254W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-22% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1+684% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 920A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 3850 X2 launched at $349 and now averages $349. The GeForce 920A costs 95.7% less ($334 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.3 (GeForce 920A) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) — the GeForce 920A offers 2204.2% better value. The GeForce 920A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-71% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-96% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.3+2204% | 2.4 |
| Codename | GM108 | Barts |
| Release | March 13 2015 | September 19 2011 |
| Ranking | #810 | #630 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











