
GeForce 920A

Radeon HD 3850 X2
GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 3850 X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 3850 X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 3850 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 920A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 252% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 254W, a 221W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3850 X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 3850 X2
2011Why buy it
- ✅10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌249% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌669.7% higher power demand at 254W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 3850 X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920A
The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.

Radeon HD 3850 X2
The Radeon HD 3850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 960 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 254W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 822 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920A scores 829 and the Radeon HD 3850 X2 reaches 822 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 3850 X2 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 960 (Radeon HD 3850 X2). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A) vs 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 3850 X2).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 829 | 822 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 960 ×2+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS ×2+113% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 ×2+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 920A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3850 X2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 920A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3850 X2 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 3850 X2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920A and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3850 X2. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920A) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3850 X2) — the GeForce 920A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 920A) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3850 X2). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+9% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5+36% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD+. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 920A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 3850 X2).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD+ |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 3850 X2's 254W — a 154% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 450W (Radeon HD 3850 X2). Power connectors: Legacy vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-87% | 254W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-22% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1+684% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 920A came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 3850 X2 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce 920A was 71.3% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (GeForce 920A) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 3850 X2) — the GeForce 920A offers 245.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 920A (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-71% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3+246% | 2.4 |
| Codename | GM108 | Barts |
| Release | March 13 2015 | September 19 2011 |
| Ranking | #810 | #630 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














