GeForce 920A vs Radeon R7 M365X
GeForce 920A
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M365X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 920A is positioned at rank 396 and the Radeon R7 M365X is on rank 602, so the GeForce 920A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920A
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M365X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 920A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M365X.
| Insight | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 920A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 920A holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $300), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1912.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1912.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920A and Radeon R7 M365X
GeForce 920A
The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.
Radeon R7 M365X
The Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920A scores 829 and the Radeon R7 M365X reaches 824 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M365X). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M365X). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 829 | 824 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 0.9472 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz+2% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920A) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M365X) — the GeForce 920A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 920A) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M365X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (11_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 920A) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M365X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 920A) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M365X).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 M365X's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M365X). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-56% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1+128% | 11.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 920A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R7 M365X launched at $300 and now averages $300. The GeForce 920A costs 95% less ($285 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.3 (GeForce 920A) vs 2.7 (Radeon R7 M365X) — the GeForce 920A offers 1948.1% better value. The Radeon R7 M365X is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-67% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-95% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.3+1948% | 2.7 |
| Codename | GM108 | Tropo |
| Release | March 13 2015 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #810 | #715 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 920A and Radeon R7 M365X
