GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 7690M

NVIDIA

GeForce 920A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7690M

2011Core: 725 MHzBoost: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 7690M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 7690M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 7690M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920A

2015

Why buy it

  • 52.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 65% higher power demand at 33W vs 20W.

Radeon HD 7690M

2011

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 20W instead of 33W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 920A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 920A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 52.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7690M instead at 832 vs 829, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 920A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 920A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 7690M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 920A

The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M

The Radeon HD 7690M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920A scores 829 and the Radeon HD 7690M reaches 832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7690M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7690M). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7690M). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 725 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 920ARadeon HD 7690M
G3D Mark Score
829
832
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS+4%
0.696 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
941 MHz+30%
725 MHz
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+300%
48 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7690M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 920ARadeon HD 7690M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 920A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7690M carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 7690M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920A and System on the Radeon HD 7690M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920A) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7690M) — the GeForce 920A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 920ARadeon HD 7690M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 7690M's 20W — a 49.1% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7690M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 920ARadeon HD 7690M
TDP
33W
20W-39%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
25.1
41.6+66%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 920A (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 920ARadeon HD 7690M
MSRP
$100
Codename
GM108
Thames
Release
March 13 2015
December 25 2011
Ranking
#810
#928

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.