
GeForce 920A

Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
GeForce 920A vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 920A vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 920A vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 920A
2015Why buy it
- ✅1.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 920A is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 920A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 920A vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920A
The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.


Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920A scores 829 and the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U reaches 832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U uses Vega, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 512 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A) vs 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 829 | 832 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Vega |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 1.843 TFLOPS+155% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1200 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 920A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 920A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U carries 0 MB. GeForce 920A gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920A and System on the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 920A) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 920A) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 920A) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U's 15W — a 75% difference. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 15W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1 | 55.5+121% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 920A came in at $100, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (GeForce 920A) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) — the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | March 13 2015 | October 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #810 | #721 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














