FirePro 3D V4800 vs GeForce 920A

FirePro 3D V4800

2010Core: 690 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 920A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro 3D V4800

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 89% HIGHER MSRP
    $189 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 124.2% higher power demand at 74W vs 33W.

GeForce 920A

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $89 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
  • Delivers 83.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 74W, a 41W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro 3D V4800 better than GeForce 920A?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 854 vs 829 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro 3D V4800 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V4800 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 1 GB instead of 512 MB. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro 3D V4800 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. FirePro 3D V4800 is about 89.0% more expensive on MSRP at $189 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and you are getting 3.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce 920A really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does GeForce 920A make more sense than FirePro 3D V4800?
Yes. GeForce 920A is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (33W vs 74W), and staying closer to $100 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro 3D V4800. The trade-off is that FirePro 3D V4800 currently gives you 3.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce 920A still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro 3D V4800GeForce 920A
1080p
low20 FPS26 FPS
medium12 FPS16 FPS
high8 FPS11 FPS
ultra4 FPS6 FPS
1440p
low14 FPS16 FPS
medium7 FPS10 FPS
high3 FPS5 FPS
ultra2 FPS3 FPS
4K
low5 FPS7 FPS
medium3 FPS5 FPS
high2 FPS3 FPS
ultra1 FPS2 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro 3D V4800GeForce 920A
1080p
low24 FPS37 FPS
medium10 FPS30 FPS
high8 FPS25 FPS
ultra6 FPS16 FPS
1440p
low11 FPS19 FPS
medium5 FPS12 FPS
high3 FPS8 FPS
ultra3 FPS6 FPS
4K
low4 FPS5 FPS
medium2 FPS3 FPS
high2 FPS3 FPS
ultra1 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro 3D V4800GeForce 920A
1080p
low38 FPS37 FPS
medium31 FPS30 FPS
high26 FPS25 FPS
ultra19 FPS19 FPS
1440p
low29 FPS28 FPS
medium23 FPS22 FPS
high19 FPS19 FPS
ultra14 FPS14 FPS
4K
low19 FPS19 FPS
medium15 FPS15 FPS
high13 FPS12 FPS
ultra10 FPS9 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro 3D V4800GeForce 920A
1080p
low38 FPS37 FPS
medium31 FPS30 FPS
high26 FPS25 FPS
ultra19 FPS19 FPS
1440p
low29 FPS10 FPS
medium23 FPS8 FPS
high19 FPS7 FPS
ultra14 FPS6 FPS
4K
low19 FPS8 FPS
medium15 FPS6 FPS
high13 FPS5 FPS
ultra8 FPS4 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V4800 and GeForce 920A

AMD

FirePro 3D V4800

The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.

NVIDIA

GeForce 920A

The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the GeForce 920A reaches 829 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 920A uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 384 (GeForce 920A). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A).

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800GeForce 920A
G3D Mark Score
854+3%
829
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+108%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS+53%
0.7227 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
80 KB
192 KB+140%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro 3D V4800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800GeForce 920A
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V4800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 920A has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V4800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 1 MB (GeForce 920A) — the GeForce 920A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800GeForce 920A
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 11.0 (GeForce 920A). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800GeForce 920A
DirectX
11.2+2%
11.0
Vulkan
None
1.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.5+2%
Max Displays
3+200%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs No (GeForce 920A). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 920A).

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800GeForce 920A
Encoder
UVD 2.3
No
Decoder
UVD 2.3
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the GeForce 920A's 33W — a 76.6% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 350W (GeForce 920A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800GeForce 920A
TDP
74W
33W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
11.5
25.1+118%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro 3D V4800 launched at $189 MSRP, while the GeForce 920A launched at $100. The GeForce 920A costs 47.1% less ($89 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 8.3 (GeForce 920A) — the GeForce 920A offers 84.4% better value. The GeForce 920A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800GeForce 920A
MSRP
$189
$100-47%
Performance per Dollar
4.5
8.3+84%
Codename
Juniper
GM108
Release
April 26 2010
March 13 2015
Ranking
#780
#810