FirePro 3D V4800
GeForce 920A
FirePro 3D V4800 vs GeForce 920A Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V4800 vs GeForce 920A FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro 3D V4800 vs GeForce 920A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌89% HIGHER MSRP$189 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌124.2% higher power demand at 74W vs 33W.
GeForce 920A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 74W, a 41W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V4800 vs GeForce 920A Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro 3D V4800
The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.
GeForce 920A
The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the GeForce 920A reaches 829 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 920A uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 384 (GeForce 920A). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 854+3% | 829 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+53% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 920A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V4800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V4800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 920A carries 512 MB. FirePro 3D V4800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V4800 and 128-bit on the GeForce 920A. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 1 MB (GeForce 920A) — the GeForce 920A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 11.0 (GeForce 920A). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+2% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | None | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5+2% |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs No (GeForce 920A). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 920A).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the GeForce 920A's 33W — a 76.6% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 350W (GeForce 920A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 33W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5 | 25.1+118% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V4800 came in at $189, while the GeForce 920A launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 920A was 47.1% cheaper ($89 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 8.3 (GeForce 920A) — the GeForce 920A offers 84.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 920A (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $189 | $100-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.5 | 8.3+84% |
| Codename | Juniper | GM108 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #780 | #810 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V4800 and GeForce 920A
