
FirePro 3D V4800
Popular choices:

GeForce 920A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro 3D V4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌89% HIGHER MSRP$189 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌124.2% higher power demand at 74W vs 33W.
GeForce 920A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 74W, a 41W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro 3D V4800
2010GeForce 920A
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 74W, a 41W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌89% HIGHER MSRP$189 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌124.2% higher power demand at 74W vs 33W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro 3D V4800 better than GeForce 920A?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce 920A make more sense than FirePro 3D V4800?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 4 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V4800 and GeForce 920A

FirePro 3D V4800
FirePro 3D V4800
The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.

GeForce 920A
GeForce 920A
The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the GeForce 920A reaches 829 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 920A uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 384 (GeForce 920A). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 854+3% | 829 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS+53% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 192 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 920A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro 3D V4800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V4800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 920A has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V4800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 1 MB (GeForce 920A) — the GeForce 920A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 11.0 (GeForce 920A). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+2% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | None | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5+2% |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs No (GeForce 920A). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 920A).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the GeForce 920A's 33W — a 76.6% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 350W (GeForce 920A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 33W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5 | 25.1+118% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V4800 launched at $189 MSRP, while the GeForce 920A launched at $100. The GeForce 920A costs 47.1% less ($89 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 8.3 (GeForce 920A) — the GeForce 920A offers 84.4% better value. The GeForce 920A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | GeForce 920A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $189 | $100-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.5 | 8.3+84% |
| Codename | Juniper | GM108 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #780 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











