GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 8500M/8700M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 8500M/8700M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 8500M/8700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 920A

2015

Why buy it

✅21.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 920A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 920A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 8500M/8700M instead at 853 vs 829, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 920A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 920A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 920A vs Radeon HD 8500M/8700M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 920A

The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M

The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 853 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 920A scores 829 and the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M reaches 853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 920A) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 775 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
G3D Mark Score	829	853+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS	0.992 TFLOPS+37%
Boost Clock	941 MHz+21%	775 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	192 KB+20%	160 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 920A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 920A and System on the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 920A) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) — the GeForce 920A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 920A) vs 12 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
DirectX	11.0	12+9%
Max Displays	1	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 920A) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Encoder	No	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	UVD 3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
TDP	33W-34%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	25.1+47%	17.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 920A (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce 920A	Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
MSRP	$100	—
Codename	GM108	Venus
Release	March 13 2015	April 1 2013
Ranking	#810	#745

Search GeForce 920A on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8500M/8700M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.